From the Right

/

Politics

Republican Governor Undercuts Trump's Anti-DEI Efforts

Victor Joecks on

Rooting out discriminatory Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs should be a top Republican priority. But it's not for Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo.

Last month, the Department of Education asked states and school districts to certify that they don't discriminate based on race. It specifically highlighted DEI programs that favor one race over another as impermissible. It warned that continued racial discrimination could result in the loss of federal funding.

Now, this should be an easy one. Racial discrimination is both wrong and illegal. Yet Steve Canavero, Nevada's Interim Superintendent of Public Instruction, refused to sign the certificate. He even sent a condescending response letter, blowing off the request. The Nevada Department of Education, he claimed, had recently certified "that it complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act." He cited doing so in connection with a 2023 submission of the revised Consolidated State Plan and the February 2025 update to the NV DOE's General Statement of Federal Assurances. Further, he asked for guidance on what certain terms meant, saying the requirements "remain ambiguous."

One might expect this level of resistance from a Democrat administration. But Lombardo, a Republican, appointed Canavero to his post last month. Lombardo's office didn't respond when I asked if he agreed with Canavero's decision not to sign the certification. Not exactly the actions of someone interested in stamping out DEI.

That's unfortunate, because there's plenty of it in Nevada's education system. Look at the Clark County School District. The job description for its Assistant Superintendent, Equity and Diversity says the position will collaborate "with the Human Resources team and provide guidance on the recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups and monitor, evaluate, and assess the adequacy of the diversity of candidates in the screening and hiring process." The district's anti-racism policy explicitly states the district will "develop and implement strategies to increase the diversity" of its staff. The policy's definition of diversity includes race.

Note to Canavero and Lombardo. These are examples of DEI initiatives that favor one race over another. They are obvious violations of Title VI, which prohibits racial discrimination in "any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." The prescribed penalty for that is terminating or withholding federal funding.

Then I looked into Canavero's claims about how Nevada has previously certified its compliance with Title VI. The 2023 Consolidated State Plan only mentioned "Title VI" once and in a very different context.

"Title VI is not explicitly referenced in the Nevada Department of Education's 2023 Consolidated State Plan," the Nevada DOE admitted in response to my questions. It insisted that approval of the plan "is contingent on assurance to all applicable federal laws."

Translation: Canavero never expected someone to check his sources.

 

The update to the 2025 General Statement of Federal Assurances isn't much better. It doesn't mention Title VI, although it requires grant recipients to agree they won't discriminate based on race.

What's happening in Nevada shows exactly why the DOE was justified in asking states and school districts to certify their compliance with Title VI. That effort is currently tied up in federal court. But don't expect that to last forever. The U.S. Supreme Court isn't going to overturn the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Lombardo should use this delay to eradicate DEI in Nevada education. He should have been doing that for the last two years. His refusal to do so doesn't make policy or political sense. The public is firmly against DEI schemes. In 2020, California rejected an affirmative action initiative by nearly 15 points. President Donald Trump won a decisive victory in 2024, including in Nevada, while campaigning against DEI.

If Lombardo and education officials don't change course, Nevada will deserve to lose its federal education funding. And snarky letters won't be of much help then.

========

Victor Joecks is a columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Email him at vjoecks@reviewjournal.com or follow @victorjoecks on X. To find out more about Victor Joecks and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the

----


Copyright 2025 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Ed Gamble John Darkow Mike Beckom Monte Wolverton Pedro X. Molina Rick McKee